Video Background Remover

00:00:00 - 00:00:59 Introduction and test images

00:00:00 - 00:00:59 The video evaluates free background remover tools using two examples: a complex image with intricate hair and a challenging background including bicycle spokes, and a simpler image for comparison. The first tool tested is pixen.ai, which has a file size limit of 0.25 megapixels.

00:00:30 - 00:01:24 Pixen.ai background remover test

00:00:30 - 00:01:24 The speaker discusses downloading an image and compares its quality to the original. The downloaded image has a much lower resolution, resulting in poor quality, especially when placed against a solid background. The mask quality is also inadequate, leading to many missing areas. The speaker then suggests leveraging Mac OS features on Apple computers for better results.

00:00:57 - 00:01:50 Mac OS built-in background removal

00:00:57 - 00:01:50 The speaker demonstrates removing backgrounds from photos using quick actions on a computer, noting that while the quality is decent, the masking is poor and unusable. They then switch to using Canva's background remover, showing the process of uploading a photo and creating an account to access the feature.

00:01:23 - 00:02:17 Canva background remover review

00:01:23 - 00:02:17 The speaker evaluates a tool that maintains decent visual quality but restricts download options. Attempts to increase image size prompt subscription requests, and the resolution remains low at 800 by 600. Trying to download with a transparent background causes the download button to disappear, despite claims of one free use after account creation.

00:01:50 - 00:03:07 Adobe Express background remover

00:01:50 - 00:03:07 The speaker tests removing backgrounds from images using different services. One service requires a subscription and is therefore disqualified. Adobe Express is then tested as a direct competitor to Canva. The removal process is straightforward with no sign-up or payment required, and the output retains the original image resolution. Although the masking is not perfect and misses some details like spokes, the image quality remains high. Adobe Express offers unlimited free usage but may ask for sign-up. Overall, it is a usable free alternative despite imperfect masking.

00:02:42 - 00:04:04 Cut Out Pro background remover test

00:02:42 - 00:04:04 The video compares background removal tools, starting with Adobe Express which provides usable masking at the original resolution. Cut Out Pro is tested next; it processes the photo but outputs a very low resolution image of 612x408 pixels, making it unusable without paying for HD quality. The original high-resolution image is contrasted with Cut Out Pro's low-quality result, leading to its disqualification. The narrator acknowledges that Photoshop is a paid but comprehensive platform for background removal and mentions upcoming coverage of free alternatives. The segment also includes a sponsorship plug for Pixerfect Pro, a resource for mastering Photoshop.

00:03:38 - 00:04:27 Pixerfect Pro Photoshop course promo

00:03:38 - 00:04:27 The platform offers hundreds of lessons designed to help learners master both techniques and concepts without memorizing steps. It emphasizes real-world hands-on projects, bite-size tutorials, and strong support for any questions. Even those undecided about pursuing mastery are encouraged to explore pixerfect.com to see the lesson structure and access some free content.

00:04:02 - 00:05:20 Remove BG background remover test

00:04:02 - 00:05:20 The video discusses using the Remove BG platform for background removal, demonstrating how to upload and download images. While the preview download is free, the max quality download requires payment. The output quality is not ideal, as the image shows some background artifacts despite capturing fine details like hair and spokes. The resolution also suffers significantly compared to the original high-resolution image. The pricing model charges $1 per background removal, making it costly to use frequently, which raises questions about the value of free background remover tools.

00:04:54 - 00:06:11 AI Ease background remover test

00:04:54 - 00:06:11 The speaker discusses background removal tools, comparing paid per-use options to Photoshop's unlimited capability. They test AI Ease by uploading a photo, noting it removes the background reasonably well but misses some details like spokes. The free download option is limited to low resolution, although 1024p is better than previous tools offering around 600p. After creating a free account, the speaker compares the original and AI Ease results, finding the quality improved but still imperfect for complex images. They then upload a simpler image of a soft toy, which AI Ease removes cleanly, again with low-resolution download options.

00:05:46 - 00:07:11 Pixelcut AI background remover test

00:05:46 - 00:07:11 The speaker evaluates several AI-powered photo background removal platforms by testing their output quality in Photoshop. Pixel Cut.AI produces a respectable 1080x720 resolution image with some sharpening and minor artifacts, but remains quite usable even when zoomed in. Despite resolution limitations, Pixel Cut and another AI tool perform well compared to Adobe Express, which offers full resolution but less accurate masking. The speaker then attempts to test a new platform called PixelR.

00:06:43 - 00:07:41 PixelR background remover test

00:06:43 - 00:07:41 The speaker demonstrates selecting multiple photos and opening them in Photoshop. They place the images on a solid color background and note that while the resolution is high at 4096 pixels, the masking quality is very soft and lacks sharpness, which diminishes its usability despite the high resolution.

00:07:11 - 00:08:41 Photo Room background remover test

00:07:11 - 00:08:41 The speaker evaluates image quality across different platforms using complex examples. One example with 4096 pixels resolution shows improved quality but misses details like spokes, leading to disqualification in favor of better options. The next platform, Photo Room, produces a respectable 1280 resolution image that captures most spokes well and appears to be the best so far when viewed in Photoshop. The results are usable and notably better even in simpler examples. The speaker then prepares to test the final platform, Erase.bg.

00:08:12 - 00:09:32 Erase.bg background remover test

00:08:12 - 00:09:32 The speaker discusses the limitation of a platform that does not accept images wider than 5,000 pixels, while their image is 7,000 pixels wide. They decide to resize the image to 4,800 pixels width using Photoshop and successfully upload it. After processing, the download preview shows a much higher resolution image. Comparing the result, the quality and resolution are better than many other platforms tested, although the masking is not perfect. The speaker considers whether signing up for a free account might allow downloading the full or higher resolution images.

00:09:06 - 00:10:23 Erase.bg account and batch processing

00:09:06 - 00:10:23 The speaker demonstrates using a free account on a background removal platform that supports batch processing by uploading multiple photos and selecting 'human' as the transformation type. They note the platform offers limited free credits before requiring payment. After processing, the images are downloaded as PNG files with higher resolution, though the masking quality varies. The speaker mentions testing many platforms and plans to compare the best ones, using Photoshop as a reference standard due to its unlimited use and consistent quality.

00:09:57 - 00:11:09 Photoshop background remover overview

00:09:57 - 00:11:09 The speaker demonstrates the background removal feature in the latest version of Photoshop, highlighting its high-quality results that accurately capture fine details like spokes. They emphasize that the tool allows unlimited usage without resolution loss and offers adjustable options such as edge refinement, halo removal, and background changes. Photoshop's reputation as an industry standard is affirmed, and viewers are directed to free tutorial videos for basic techniques. The segment concludes by introducing a comparison of standard qualified results alongside their respective output resolutions.

00:10:47 - 00:12:15 Comparison of free background removers

00:10:47 - 00:12:15 The video compares background removal tools based on their output resolution and masking quality. Erase BG offers the highest resolution at 3600 width, followed by Photo Room at 1280, and AIE and Pixel Cut near 1080 and 1024 respectively. When examining details like spokes, Photo Room delivers the best masking, with Pixel Cut somewhat effective, and AIE and Erase BG being similar. Looking at hair masking quality, Erase BG has the best resolution, but Photo Room provides the most balanced and usable mask, despite some oversharpening in other tools. The presenter chooses Photo Room for further comparison with Adobe Express to evaluate masking and resolution trade-offs.

00:11:46 - 00:12:36 Detailed masking quality comparison

00:11:46 - 00:12:36 The speaker compares Photo Room and Photoshop for image editing, noting that while Photoshop is a paid platform, both offer impressive results. Photo Room, despite its lower resolution, handles hair details well, and Adobe Express also performs decently, though it misses some finer details. The speaker leaves the judgment of the best platform open to the viewer.

00:12:11 - 00:13:20 Final recommendations and conclusion

00:12:11 - 00:13:20 The speaker recommends Photo Room as a free background remover offering a good balance between resolution and masking quality, with a link provided in the description. For those willing to pay, Photoshop is suggested as a superior alternative that offers unlimited background removals and advanced features like background changes, edge refinement, and halo removal. The video concludes with a call to action to like, subscribe, and ring the notification bell for future tips and tutorials.

00:12:58 - 00:13:42 Closing remarks and outro

00:12:58 - 00:13:42 The speaker thanks the audience for watching and encourages them to stay tuned and keep creating. They then reflect on a personal moment of solitude, feeling content and carefree while enjoying their own company and humming a song.